Scott G
My feedback
25 results found
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Scott G
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Scott G
commented
What I’m looking for is a simpler way to enter AP direct expenses without having to lookup which GL account the expense should be associated with. For example, if someone is entering Stamps.com expense is this for “office expense” or a GL account under “postage.” Is Exxon an auto expense or fuel? Verizon is office, or telecommunications expense? What I’m looking for is sort of what aliases do in OE. Keywords would have to be initially typed into a list.
An error occurred while saving the comment Scott G
commented
To be clear: When entering AP as direct expense a list that can be built by description for items that a repetitive and linked to a specific GL account number.
To be clear let’s say your entering on a Chase credit card gas from Exxon. When Exxon is typed that description would be linked to “auto expense.”
When you type Walmart it could link to misc expense.Scott G
shared this idea
·
-
13 votes
Thanks for the idea! We are reviewing this idea for future development.
Scott G
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Scott G
commented
Not important to me anymore but perhaps others who don't notice. The assumption is if the BR posts everything is okay.
Scott G
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteScott G
shared this idea
·
-
34 votes
Thanks for the idea!
This is being reviewed for future programming. Watch for further updates in the future.
Scott G
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteScott G
shared this idea
·
-
4 votes
Thank you for the suggestion. I’ve set this to be reviewed by our development team.
In the meantime, if you want to transfer between customers, make sure you are using codes 2 and 5 and not 3 and 4. Using 2s and 5s will ensure it doesn’t hit your BR, and the GL entries will cancel each other out if set up correctly. If you have any questions about this please reach out to our customer service department.
Scott G
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteScott G
shared this idea
·
-
13 votes
Thanks for the idea!
Scott G
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
Thanks for the feedback!
We are currently reviewing our options for resizing the formats for different screens.
Our programming code may need to be modified to accommodate this function, so we are evaluating the best way to accomplish this.
Our Technical Support Representatives may be able to offer some suggestions on screen resolution and font size combinations to help with this issue. If you would like to submit a support ticket, please call 800-390-7053.
Scott G
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
Thanks for the idea!
Scott G
supported this idea
·
-
33 votes
Thanks for the idea!
We have some changes for the Denali screens as soon as we are able to commit resources to them. Watch for these changes in future updates.
Scott G
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesScott G
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
We are currently evaluating options for a mobile solution that will be usable on cross platform devices. There is no timeline for this development, but we are aware of the need for this functionality, and are working toward a solution.
Scott G
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
A revision of this function is planned for future development to make the blocking and dates more clear.
Scott G
supported this idea
·
-
78 votes
This idea has been submitted for future development.
Scott G
supported this idea
·
-
40 votesScott G
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
Thanks for the idea!
Scott G
shared this idea
·
-
4 votes
Thanks for the idea!
Scott G
shared this idea
·
I'm aware that you can purposely do a single sided entry. What I'm asking for is a fail safe so the system can't post an out of balance transaction unless warned. I have an out of balance not knowing when or how it happened.