Skip to content

Feedback

Thank you for using Customer Voice! This is a forum for general constructive feedback on our programs and services. We work very hard to ensure the success of our customers, let us know what you think!

27 results found

  1. Denali Payroll Grid Modification for prompting shortcoming in design.

    Can I make a strong suggestion for future upgrades. Under the “Employee Information” selection screen add 2 sort parameters selection fields. A Primary Sort selection and a Secondary Sort selection. Under primary and secondary sort options available to these would be 1. Employee Number 2. Employee Last Name 3. Department 4. Any of the User Defined Fields assigned by the employer. Number 4 gives you unlimited flexibility to your system prompting order. When you select this option then if you ran all hourly employees for all departments and select a primary sort of department and a secondary sort as last…

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. AP GL Expense Distribution report should have from and to limits for Vendor number

    The AP GL expense distribution would be more useful if you could limit the vendor you wanted to report on with a from and to. It would really be excellent if you also had the windows like you do the GL accounts allowing you to move over multiple vendors to report on like you can GL Account.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Add vendor number to available columns in purchase order receiving window.

    It would be nice to have both the vendor item number and our in-house part number when receiving in the receiving window, instead of relying on the paper copy being printed out correctly.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Understock Report does not have the Qty on Back Order field available {decQuantityOnBO}

    UNDERSTOCK REPORT: To make intelligent decisions regarding stock minimums purchases, we should be able to see what quantity is on back order using the {decQuantityOnBO} field. Previous versions of this report always included the back order quantity field connection to the database so we could insert into the understock report. The normal Backorder report won't work for this function because it doesn't contain the min/max stock quantity fields. This is important and must be fairly simple to do - we're only talking about making one more field accessible to the field explorer. Total time can't even be an hour worth…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. GL-Report Daily Balances

    Provide a GL report where you can see the daily GL balance. All user to specify the GL Acct # and date range with single line detail that includes:
    Date Tran Description Debit Amt Credit Amt Balance

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. GL Audit Trail Period Total Option is not Correct as written for Fiscal Calender Companies

    Even back to CMS Professional the GL Audit trail option for "print subtotals" only gave calendar month totals which is not programmed correctly. It should use the fiscal calendar on file to generate totals on those dates and have nothing to do with a straight simple calendar month total. We are a 4-4-5 quarter with periods always ending on a Saturday and that Saturday can be in the following month beginning days. It would be nice if the program would use the fiscal calendar to generate these subtotals.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Reporting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Change Program Logic for Rolling Fiscal Calenders Years 1-5

    We are a 4-4-5 calendar ending in the last Saturday of the month. When you close your GL year the current system butchers all years of the calendars by trying to compute what it cannot do, an irregular calendar. The system should take current existing years 2-5 and move them to current years 1-4 and only try to compute the 5th year when you close out your GL year. This would save a ton of work because you would not have to rekey all years of your calendar.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
2 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base